Tag Archives: Canada

Fukushima Reactor radiation reached Europe and the MSM never said a word

 

Cover up of Japan Fukushima Nuclear Radiation Fallout Forecasts Exposed!

Source

I previously reported on the steady concentrated stream of Nuclear radioactive fallout heading toward the US and Canada. In that post I pointed out that several censored radiation forecasts have been found but were never released to the public.

We now have for the first time a side by side comparison of two radiation fallout forecasts. On the left is the censored version released to the public downplaying the levels of radiation spreading around the world. On the right is the same uncensored forecast.

Left: Censored Fallout Forecast Released To Public — Right: Uncensored Forecast Hidden From Public

If you have doubt that the censored version is the real forecast then consider this: Notice the censored version doesn’t show radiation hitting Europe.

Now checkout this article from the Independent reporting that the nuclear fallout has hit Europe.

Reactor radiation reaches Europe

AP Wednesday, 23 March 2011

A plume from the Fukushima Dai-ichi complex carrying trace amounts of radioactive iodine has been detected in Iceland, the country’s Radiation Safety Authority said.

However, it added, the concentration was “less than a millionth” of what was found in European countries in the wake of the 1986 Chernobyl disaster that spewed radiation over a large distance.

Recollections of the accident’s aftermath continue to haunt many in European, putting them on edge as they watch the Japanese nuclear crisis unfold.

“We thus conclude that there is no reason to worry about radioactivity levels in Iceland, nor anywhere in Europe, resulting from the nuclear accident in Japan,” said Sigurdur Emil Palsson, head of emergency planning.

Elsewhere, French authorities said very weakly contaminated air is expected to reach France today while Germany’s Federal Office for Radiation Protection said if and when radiation arrived it would be in marginal amounts that would pose neither a risk to humans or the environment.

“The measurements will also be much lower that those after the Chernobyl disaster,” it said.

[…]

Source: The Independent

here are the “public” forecasts… which show “low” levels of Cesium-137 …

http://transport.nilu.no/products/fukushima?searchterm=fuk

however…

This site was sent to me, and it clearly shows the hidden (not shown to public) forecasts! In these shots, we see VERY high levels of Cesium-137 making its way across the pacific to the USA and Canada.

http://squid.nilu.no/~burkhart/sharing/MOVIES/?C=M;O=D

http://squid.nilu.no/~burkhart/sharing/

—————-

http://eurdeppub.jrc.it/eurdeppub/home.aspx#

http://www.csn.es/index.php?option=com_maps&view=mappoints&Itemid=32

http://www.jaif.or.jp/english/

http://www.rivm.nl/milieuportaal/dossier/meetnetten/radioactiviteit/resultaten/

http://www.radiationnetwork.com/

http://www.blackcatsystems.com/RadMap/map.html

http://www.epa.gov (click on radiation update)

http://www.irsn.fr/EN/Pages/home.aspx

http://www.nucleartourist.com/

http://www.stuk.fi/index_en.html

http://www.mext.go.jp/english/radioactivity_level/detail/1303962.htm

http://www.nisa.meti.go.jp/english/index.html

http://www.rivm.nl/milieuportaal/dossier/meetnetten/radioactiviteit/resultaten/

http://www.yle.fi/tekstitv/html/P867_02.html

http://www.mapion.co.jp/topics/genpatu/

http://strahlenbelastung.wo-wann-wer.de/

dutch radiation monitoring:

http://www.rivm.nl/milieuportaal/dossier/meetnetten/radioactiviteit/resultaten/

swiss radiation monitoring:

https://www.naz.ch/en/aktuell/zeitverlaeufe.html

Finland radiation monitoring:

http://www.yle.fi/tekstitv/html/P160_01.html

http://www.yle.fi/tekstitv/html/P867_02.html

French radiation monitoring: (thanks to youtube user: RehKurts ! )

http://sws.irsn.fr/sws/mesure/index

http://www.irsn.fr/FR/Documents/france.htm

jet stream forecasting:

http://squall.sfsu.edu/crws/jetstream.html

http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/CT/animate.arctic.color.0.html

http://nowcoast.noaa.gov/

http://www.srh.noaa.gov/srh/tropicalwx/satpix/nwpac_ir4_loop.php

http://www.stormsurfing.com/cgi/display_alt.cgi?a=glob_250

FAIR USE NOTICE: These Videos may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode

 


Connection between Chemtrails, Morgellons, and GMO

by Aajonus Vonderplanitz, Ph.D.
optimal@earthlink.net

I have seen them and been aware of them since 1997. From the mountains of Malibu, California, at 8:00 am on Friday, November 18, 2005, I watched jets in the skies over Ventura and Los Angles Counties streaking the skies with chemtrails. They have occurred almost everyday since. Some days as many as 80 patterns existed, going from the ocean to 40 miles inland. The chemtrails drifted from as far as Oxnard and fall on all Los Angeles County inhabitants. Chemtrails are frequently sprayed directly over all areas of Los Angeles County. They are being reported in most areas of the USA. Nearly daily since Friday, November 18, 2005, chemtrails streaked the skies at Venice Beach, drifting inland over Los Angeles residents.

When we see a cloudy tail following a jet streaking the sky and that tail dissolves within minutes, that is a contrail. Contrails form above 33,000 feet when hot engine exhaust momentarily condenses ice crystals into pencil-thin vapor trails that quickly vanish behind a jet. However, chemtrails, looking initially look like contrails, are thicker, remain extended across the sky and are sprayed in varying patterns: x’s, tic-tack-toe grids, cross-hatch and parallel lines. Instead of quickly dissipating, chemtrails expand. Usually within thirty minutes, they open into wispy formations, looking like cirrus-type clouds (thin veil clouds) that persist for hours but slowly waft from the skies on our families, friends and strangers below.

Laboratory examination of those chemicals found that they were manufacturing wastes from military industry and biowarfare substances. In several laboratory analyses, the composition of chemtrails was revealed:
1. Aluminum barium
2. Aluminum Oxide
3. Bacilli and Molds
4. Pseudomonas Aeruginosa
5. Pseudomonas Florescens
6. Bacilli Amyloliquefaciens
7. Streptomyces
8. Enterobacteriaceae
9. Serratia Marcscens
10. Human white Blood Cells-A restrictor enzyme used in research labs to snip and combine DNA
11. Enterobacter Cloacal
12. Other Bacilli and other toxic molds capable of producing heart disease and meningitis as well as acute upper respiratory and gastrointestinal distress.
13. Carcinogen Zinc Cadmium Sulfide.

After chemtrails lingered, spread, covered entire skies and fell, reports of illnesses increased substantially, such as persistent hacking coughs, upper respiratory and intestinal distress, pneumonia, fatigue, lethargy, dizziness, disorientation, headaches, aching joints and muscles, nosebleeds, diarrhea, bloody stools, depression, anxiety, loss of bladder control, and nervous tics. Much of it is reported as flu and everyone but a few know that much of it is poisons dropped over our heads, inhaled, absorbed through our skins, and consumed in our food.

Using both electrostatic precipitation devices and hepa air filters to collect outdoor atmosphere samples, chemtrail researcher Cliff Carnicom and his associates have documented desiccated blood cells floating in the atmosphere in populated areas of both New Mexico and Colorado. With so many atmospheric samples containing biological components, Carnicom concludes that crimes of the highest order are being perpetrated against citizens without their knowledge or consent.

Witnesses have documented and photographed military KC-135’s, KC-105 and white unmarked jets spray chemtrails. Airport personnel and pilots confirmed specific commercial airliners leaving the long-lasting chemtrails. Although chemtrails are frequently reported, the US Government continues to deny the existence of chemtrails.

In 1994, it was established in a senate committee that the military was developing genetically engineered pathogens since the 1960’s when the military initiated a special viral cancer program with the intent to create contagious cancers for biowarfare? There is much laboratory evidence that gels, webs, powders and blood cells have been used to harbor viruses, mycoplasma and/or other bio-engineered toxins until they reach their host. Who besides the department of defense would have the money, power and inclination to besmirch our atmosphere with biological materials and have legal and media immunity?

In August 2000, observers began to report jets deploying chemtrails that looked like normal cloud formations. Three reports stated cloud formations dripped feathers and mare’s tails. Citizen-based investigators believe that, since the military and government has received complaints about the chemtrails, they adjusted the chemtrail mix to be more clandestine. Chemtrail observers, including I, continue to see fake cirrus-type clouds on top of and surrounding real cumulus clouds.

Generally, chemtrails spraying increases as clouds build. They have been spraying most areas intensely in the USA, Canada, Europe and England since 1998, including areas with no commercial path’s overhead. Even if you do not see chemtrails in your area, our food supply is being sprayed in farmlands across the USA. Frequently, I travel throughout the USA. I have observed chemtrails in at least 60 cities and farm towns that I visited since 1997. Many Americans reported seeing and feeling chemical mists fall from the sky following chemtrails. The media fails to cover the issue even though the health consequences are enormous. Environmentally conscious groups have had no luck pressing the media for coverage. Why is the media refuses to investigate and cover the story? Could it be pretense of “national security”?

Chemical weapons encapsulated in protective coatings like synthetic webbing would explain why many people who saw web-like filaments drifting down from the skies reported illness after contacting the webs. When webs were closely examined, they proved to be a man-made filaments of the type developed by both industrial and military entities. South Africans reported web-like filaments falling from an aircraft, forming a blanket like appearance across vegetation, telephone poles and fences, and E-boli soon followed. When cattle ate it, some developed large lumps on their hides, became listless and/or went blind. Examining collected material from the spray, a University of Michigan lab found pseudomonas fluorescens. That is the bug tested on Oakville residents. It can cause human infections including fatal shock. The military likes it because it glows and allows them to track its path. Pathogens, including staph and several fungi that can cause lung disease were found in the chemical mix. In what must have been in bolder military arrogant fashion, during numerous chemtrail sprays, the small town Sallisaw in Oklahoma was saturated when a web like material covered the town. Lab technicians discovered large enterobacteria. The critter was a man-developed combination of E-Coli, salmonella and anthrax that could only be a U.S. military designer bug for biowarfare.

Standing before government officials in Louisiana where the military had determined to conduct open-air germ tests, Captain Joyce Riley boldly told officials that the only acts of terrorism ever conducted on American soil were perpetrated by our own government. Is the US Government warning about terrorism yet committing acts of terrorism against its own citizens? During tests to perfect the technology, reports that aerosol barium titanate salt mixture was released from military aircraft, forming chemical trails in the atmosphere across America. Barium salts – radioactive material – were used in Libya, Panama and Desert Storm where they were sprayed and exploded over head to make people extremely sick and weak. Barium effects were accelerated and magnified by mixing and altering with other chemicals. Spectrum analysis revealed barium compounds but the other compounds were initially hidden by a shell around them. The shell, however, eventually released the other chemicals, like time-released disease-pills.

Is the military continuing open-air-testing in populated areas across the USA with dangerous chemical biowarfare, or arrogantly dumping military chemical waste on us? Whatever it is, we must stop this mass poisoning of us and our children now!

 


Texas Death Row

 

On May 3 1993, Barbara Canada and her brother Titus were killed by gunfire. Willie Tyrone Trottie, Barbara’s 23-year-old common law husband and father of their 1-1/2 year old son, was convicted of Capital murder. Having been shot five times by Titus, Willie maintains that in shock and pain, he fired in self-defense and that there is at least one witness who could have corroborated this had they been questioned at his trial. Willie was rushed through trial on to Death Row.

CASE INFORMATION
My Appeal
(In W. T. Trottie’s Own Words)

The general features of a death penalty case, As you might or might not be familiar with, a death penalty case has several special features.

The trial is essentially divided into two parts. The first and generally larger part is what might be called the guilt/innocence part of the trial, where both sides argue in the question of whether the defendant actually is guilty of capital murder (the kind that can give the death penalty).

If the jury after that part decides to find the defendant guilty of capital murder, the trial goes on to what you might call the punishment part. Here the two parts argue whether there are any mitigating circumstances, and whether the defendant presents any future dangerousness. If the defense counsel fails to convince the jury of the mitigating circumstances, the jury might give the defendant the death penalty. After the trial you can appeal to higher courts. The appeals process in a death penalty case has essentially three stages: the direct appeal, which is generally is the first post-trial review. Here you are confined to raise challenges to what is on the record of the trial.

But in what is with an ancient term are called habeas corpus-proceedings, the defendant (and his attorney) may raise questions based on new evidence about the fairness of his trial. For instance, whether his lawyer performed competently, whether the prosecution withheld important evidence or whether the jurors engaged in misconduct. The habeas appeals go first to state level, and after may also so go further to a federal level.

My appeals The same attorney that was counsel at my trial filed my direct appeal. The Court of Criminal Appeals (CCA) affirmed the conviction and sentence of death in an opinion delivered September 20, 1995 .

My appointed attorney, Jim L. Peacock of Houston , handles my habeas corpus appeal to the Court of Criminal Appeals in Texas . That appeal was filed August 18, 1997 . In that is argued that I was not given a fair trial.

These are the main points, as stated in the beginning of this appeal (Note: Both terms Defendant and Applicant apply to me, Tyrone Trottie): Counsel at trial presented no defense to the charges against his client. Merely cross-examining the States witnesses does not a defense make. More often than not the cross examination of the States witnesses did nothing more than repeat what had already been presented, thus reinforcing the States case rather than attacking it. More egregorius still was the failure of counsel to call any witnesses to the stand in defense at the guilt/innocence stage of trial. Certainly the fact that Titus Cornelius Canada had previously waved a gun at the Defendant in a threatening manner while the Defendant had his 1 year old child in the car with him raised the issue of the Defendants right to arm himself and confront Mr. Canada regarding their conflicts. This is particularly true since there was inevitably going to be further contact between them due to the familial relationship of Mr. Canada as Uncle to the Defendants son. How the issue of self defense could be so cavalierly ignored as it was by defense counsel is hard to explain. The obvious issues which should have been raised are self defense and the right to arm and confront as to Titus Cornelius Canada and voluntary manslaughter issues of sudden passion as to both Titus and Barbara Canada. Trial counsel did not call one single witness on the Defendants behalf to properly raise these issues even though there was available evidence. Failure to properly present the available evidence or request appropriate defensive charges can not be argued to be a tactic or strategy when no other defense is offered. When the obvious and only available trial defenses are ignored by trial counsel then no other conclusion can be drawn than that there was ineffective assistance of counsel.

Applicant contends that he was denied effective assistance of counsel by virtue of his trial counsels acts and omissions; by denying applicant the opportunity to testify in his own behalf at trial, Counsels ineffectiveness in failing to seek proper jury instructions and argue self defense and the right to arm and confront. Further, Applicant would show that trial counsel failed to present important, competent, and available evidence supporting mitigation in the punishment phase of his trial. Applicant contends that, under any standard. Trial counsels action constitute ineffective assistance of counsel under the United States and Texas Constitutions.
Since the entire appeal consists of 51 pages, plus several exhibits, I will hereby confine myself to some quotes concerning the main issues.
Why was I not called to take the witness stand?
Concerning this issue, the appeal argues:
The defendant had no prior felony or misdemeanor convictions of moral turpitude which would have subjected him to impeachment at trial and was without doubt the best witness to present his defensive theories to the jury regarding manslaughter and self defense and of course mitigation. To be denied this by counsels failure to properly advise of a defendants testimonial rights and refusal to call the defendant is ineffective.

In this case, Applicants counsels failure to seek jury charges and then argue self-defense and the right to arm and confront were examples of ineffective assistance of counsel in that such a defense could have negated the States theory of multiple murder. That failure leads to a harsher punishment (death) than otherwise would have occurred if the defenses were presented. Furthermore, there was evidence before the jury specifically as to the shooting of Titus Canada that the Applicant was returning fire in self defense, having first been shot at by the deceased. The failure to properly present evidence of the defense and obtain proper instruction for the jury denied the Defendant effective counsel since there was no other theory of defense present. This type of failure to present such an important defense would constitute such an egregiously prejudicial mistake so as to presume, even from just this one mistake ineffective assistance of counsel. Mitigating factors were not properly presented. By not taking the witness stand myself, my chances were negatively affected during the punishment phase of my trial, where mitigating circumstances are presented especially since I was not in a position to explain an instance of shooting in 1990 that is not in any police files and not evidence at all:

The failure to properly advise the defendant of his right to testify and in effect prevent the defendant from testifying denied the jury the most crucial of all mitigating evidence and denied the Applicant effective representation of counsel. Since the defendant was represented on direct appeal by trial counsel it is not surprising that this issue can only now be raised by Habeas Corpus Writ. In the case at bar, Applicants trial counsels ineffective assistance was exacerbated when he failed to properly preserve the constitutional argument regarding the trial courts admission into evidence the fact that Applicant shot someone in self-defense in March 1990. See Trottie v. State of Texas No, 71, 793, Opinion Delivered December 11, 1995 , p. 13. As the Court of Criminal Appeals observed in its Opinion sustaining Applicants conviction: appellant argues that the trial court violated the Eight and Fourteenth Amendments when it admitted, at the punishment stage, evidence that he shot someone in self-defense in March 1990. We not address this constitutional argument, however, because it does not comport with the argument made in the trial court.See Trottie v. State of Texas No, 71, 793, Opinion Delivered December 11, 1995 , p. 13.

In the case at bar, trial counsels failure to introduce all mitigating evidence available was made worse by his failure to preserve what error did occur regarding the evidence that came in during the punishment stage. Taken together, the trial counsels failure to properly protect Applicants record and his failure to submit important, relevant, available, persuasive evidence on mitigation doomed Applicant during the punishment stage of his trial. Faulty instruction of the jury To avoid the all too common, but wrongful notion, that if a person convicted of capital murder is sentenced to something less than death, he will be out in the streets within just some years, it is essential that the jury gets the right information on what a life sentence would mean. This did not happen during my trial: The trial court violated the eight amendment by failing or refusing to inform applicants capital sentencing that a life sentence would require that applicant serve at least 35 years before being eligible for parole.
In Texas , a defendant who is sentenced to life in prison for capital murder must serve 15, 35, or 40 years before he is eligible for parole, depending on the date of the offense.The result of this lack of information negatively affected the jurys view in the key issue of future dangerousness.Because it is a common belief that anything less than death means that the offender would be out in the streets in a relatively short time. It is of course easier to give someone a life sentence, if you know that this means he would serve at least 35 years in prison, than if you do not know how long he would be in prison. In the words of my appeal:

The very fact that the jury is told that the Board of Pardons and Paroles controls the actual length of the sentence without telling the jury the limits of that power invites speculation by the jury and creates uncertainty in their minds on how long a Defendant would actually serve as a minimum on a life sentence.This claim is supported by what the United States Supreme Court wrote in the decision of a previous case (Simmons v. South Carolina, 512 U.S. 154, 114 S.Ct. 2187, 129 L. Ed. 2d 133, 1994):

Where a defendants future dangerousness is at issue, and state law prohibits his release on parole, due process requires that the sentencing jury be informed that the defendant is parole ineligible. In my case, the outcome might very well been different if the jury instruction had been correct.

The words of my appeal sum it up:
In the instant case, had the trial court instructed the jury on the correct meaning of a life sentence, jurors would have been faced with a choice of sentencing Applicant to death or sentencing him to a life behind bars in a maximum security prison until he was, at the very minimum, over fifty years old. One or more jurors very well may have voted for a life sentence had they been informed of this information, since it would have provided a rational basis for jurors to conclude that Applicant would not be a future danger if a life sentence were imposed.

Insufficient evidence in the punishment phase.
A person might be found guilty of capital murder. In the then following punishment phase of the trial, the jury asks itself if there are mitigating circumstances; is the answer to this question yes, they cannot give that person the death penalty. As my appeal states, citing the previous case Valdez v. State, 776 S. W. 2d 162 (Tex. Crim. App 1989) ,in my case the jury was not given these evidences :
The reviewing court could consider factors such as:
1) the circumstances of the capital murder offense;
2) the calculated nature of the defendants conduct;
3) the deliberateness exhibited in the crimes execution;
4) existence and severity of the defendants previous offenses;
5) whether the defendant was acting under duress or the domination of another at the time of the crime;
6) the defendants age and personal circumstances;
7) psychiatric evidence;
8) character evidence.
Concentrating on only the areas where the evidence falls substantially below that which should be necessary to justify the death penalty in this case, Applicant would show that there was no probative, reliable, competent evidence that he had a history of violence, that he entered the Canada household on the evening in question with the specific intent to harm anyone, that the only psychiatric testimony showed that the Applicant had specific, identifiable, and treatable problems that impacted his ability to judge the situation appropriately on the night in question, and that his age and personal circumstances mitigated against the imposition of the death penalty. When the evidence is viewed in accordance with the Valdez factors, one is left with the conclusion that either there is insufficient evidence to conclude that Applicant was a continuing threat to society or that the mitigating evidence neglected by trial counsel would have been of paramount importance in the trial below, in the light of the way the evidence came before the jury. In either event, with either conclusion, the imposition of the death penalty on Applicant was inappropriate and violated his rights under the federal and state constitutions.

Compounding the errors committed during the trial, one must also view the problematic admission of certain hearsay evidence from Lynn Clark, the Applicants probation officer. APO Clark testified, over trial counsels objection, that Applicant had said he had shot some man in self-defense.No charges had ever been filed, no victim was ever identified, there was no conviction, no date of the alleged offense and no location for the alleged offense. Put simply, Clark s evidence did not show an extraneous offense. Still, after that, my original trial lawyers tried to argue that this alleged shooting was self-defense, which made things worse for me:

Trial counsel argued, to the trial court and the jury, an implied acceptance of the existence of the extraneous offense with a justification that it was self-defense.This particular piece of evidence was the only direct evidence that Applicant may have been violent at some point in the past.

Read more: http://willietyronetrottie.webnode.com/case-information/case-information/
Create your own website for free: http://www.webnode.com

 


You Can't Prove A Man Innocent If You Have Killed Them Already

 

ABOLITIONIST FOR ALL CRIMES
Countries whose laws do not provide for the death penalty for any crime
ALBANIA
ANDORRA
ANGOLA
ARGENTINA
ARMENIA
AUSTRALIA
AUSTRIA
AZERBAIJAN
BELGIUM
BHUTAN
BOSNIA-HERZEGOVINA
BULGARIA
BURUNDI
CAMBODIA
CANADA
CAPE VERDE
COLOMBIA
COOK ISLANDS
COSTA RICA
COTE D’IVOIRE
CROATIA
CYPRUS
CZECH REPUBLIC
DENMARK
DJIBOUTI
DOMINICAN REPUBLIC
ECUADOR
ESTONIA
FINLAND
FRANCE
GABON
GEORGIA

GERMANY
GREECE
GUINEA-BISSAU
HAITI
HOLY SEE
HONDURAS
HUNGARY
ICELAND
IRELAND
ITALY
KIRIBATI
KYRGYSTAN
LATVIA
LIECHTENSTEIN
LITHUANIA
LUXEMBOURG
MACEDONIA (former Yugoslav Republic)
MALTA
MARSHALL ISLANDS
MAURITIUS
MEXICO
MICRONESIA (Federated States)
MOLDOVA
MONACO
MONTENEGRO
MOZAMBIQUE
NAMIBIA
NEPAL
NETHERLANDS
NEW ZEALAND
NICARAGUA
NIUE
NORWAY

PALAU
PANAMA
PARAGUAY
PHILIPPINES
POLAND
PORTUGAL
ROMANIA
RWANDA
SAMOA
SAN MARINO
SAO TOME AND PRINCIPE
SENEGAL
SERBIA
SEYCHELLES
SLOVAKIA
SLOVENIA
SOLOMON ISLANDS
SOUTH AFRICA
SPAIN
SWEDEN
SWITZERLAND
TIMOR-LESTE
TOGO
TURKEY
TURKMENISTAN
TUVALU
UKRAINE
UNITED KINGDOM
URUGUAY
UZBEKISTAN
VANUATU
VENEZUELA

ABOLITIONIST FOR “ORDINARY CRIMES” ONLY
Countries whose laws provide for the death penalty only for exceptional crimes such as crimes under military law or crimes committed in exceptional circumstances
BOLIVIA
BRAZIL
CHILE EL SALVADOR
FIJI
ISRAEL KAZAKHSTAN
PERU

ABOLITIONIST IN PRACTICE
Countries which retain the death penalty for ordinary crimes such as murder but can be considered abolitionist in practice in that they have not executed anyone during the past 10 years and are believed to have a policy or established practice of not carrying out executions. The list also includes countries which have made an international commitment not to use the death penalty
ALGERIA
BENIN
BRUNEI DARUSSALAM
BURKINA FASO
CAMEROON
CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC
CONGO (Republic)
ERITREA
GAMBIA
GHANA
GRENADA

KENYA
KOREA (SOUTH)
LAOS
LIBERIA
MADAGASCAR
MALAWI
MALDIVES
MALI
MAURITANIA
MONGOLIA
MOROCCO
MYANMAR
NAURU

NIGER
PAPUA NEW GUINEA
RUSSIAN FEDERATION
SIERRA LEONE
SRI LANKA
SURINAME
SWAZILAND
TAJIKISTAN
TANZANIA
TONGA
TUNISIA
ZAMBIA

RETENTIONIST COUNTRIES
Countries which retain the death penalty for ordinary crimes
AFGHANISTAN
ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA
BAHAMAS
BAHRAIN
BANGLADESH
BARBADOS
BELARUS
BELIZE
BOTSWANA
CHAD
CHINA
COMOROS
CONGO (Democratic Republic)
CUBA
DOMINICA
EGYPT
EQUATORIAL GUINEA
ETHIOPIA
GUATEMALA GUINEA
GUYANA
INDIA
INDONESIA
IRAN
IRAQ
JAMAICA
JAPAN
JORDAN
KOREA (North)
KUWAIT
LEBANON
LESOTHO
LIBYA
MALAYSIA
NIGERIA
OMAN
PAKISTAN
PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY
QATAR
SAINT KITTS & NEVIS
SAINT LUCIA
SAINT VINCENT & GRENADINES
SAUDI ARABIA
SINGAPORE
SOMALIA
SOUTH SUDAN
SUDAN
SYRIA
TAIWAN
THAILAND
TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO
UGANDA
UNITED ARAB EMIRATES
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
VIET NAM
YEMEN
ZIMBABWE

COUNTRIES THAT HAVE ABOLISHED THE DEATH PENALTY SINCE 1976
1976 PORTUGAL abolished the death penalty for all crimes.
1978 DENMARK abolished the death penalty for all crimes.
1979 LUXEMBOURG, NICARAGUA and NORWAY abolished the death penalty for all crimes. BRAZIL, FIJI and PERU abolished the death penalty for ordinary crimes.
1981 FRANCE and CAPE VERDE abolished the death penalty for all crimes.
1982 The NETHERLANDS abolished the death penalty for all crimes.
1983 CYPRUS and EL SALVADOR abolished the death penalty for ordinary crimes.
1984 ARGENTINA abolished the death penalty for ordinary crimes.
1985 AUSTRALIA abolished the death penalty for all crimes.
1987 HAITI, LIECHTENSTEIN and the GERMAN DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC1 abolished the death penalty for all crimes.
1989 CAMBODIA, NEW ZEALAND, ROMANIA and SLOVENIA2 abolished the death penalty for all crimes.
1990 ANDORRA, CROATIA,2 the CZECH AND SLOVAK FEDERAL REPUBLIC,3 HUNGARY, IRELAND, MOZAMBIQUE, NAMIBIA and SAO TOMÉ AND PRíNCIPE abolished the death penalty for all crimes.
1992 ANGOLA, PARAGUAY and SWITZERLAND abolished the death penalty for all crimes.
1993 GUINEA-BISSAU, HONG KONG4 and SEYCHELLES abolished the death penalty for all crimes. GREECE abolished the death penalty for ordinary crimes.
1994 ITALY abolished the death penalty for all crimes.
1995 DJIBOUTI, MAURITIUS, MOLDOVA and SPAIN abolished the death penalty for all crimes.
1996 BELGIUM abolished the death penalty for all crimes.
1997 GEORGIA, NEPAL, POLAND and SOUTH AFRICA abolished the death penalty for all crimes. BOLIVIA and BOSNIA-HERZEGOVINA abolished the death penalty for ordinary crimes.
1998 AZERBAIJAN, BULGARIA, CANADA, ESTONIA, LITHUANIA and the UNITED KINGDOM abolished the death penalty for all crimes.
1999 EAST TIMOR, TURKMENISTAN and UKRAINE abolished the death penalty for all crimes. LATVIA5 abolished the death penalty for ordinary crimes.
2000 COTE D’IVOIRE and MALTA abolished the death penalty for all crimes. ALBANIA6 abolished the death penalty for ordinary crimes.
2001 BOSNIA-HEZEGOVINA 7 abolished the death penalty for all crimes. CHILE abolished the death penalty for ordinary crimes.
2002 TURKEY abolished the death penalty for ordinary crimes. The FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF YUGOSLAVIA (now two states SERBIA and MONTENEGRO 9 ) and CYPRUS abolished the death penalty for all crimes
2003
ARMENIA abolished the death penalty for ordinary crimes
2004
BHUTAN, SAMOA, SENEGAL and TURKEY abolished the death penalty for all crimes
2005
LIBERIA 8 and MEXICO abolished the death penalty for all crimes.
2006
PHILIPPINES abolished the death penalty for all crimes.
2007
ALBANIA6 abolished the death penalty for all crimes. and RWANDA abolished the death penalty for all crimes. KYRGYZSTAN abolished the death penalty for ordinary crimes.
2008
UZBEKISTAN, CHILE and ARGENTINA abolished the death penalty for all crimes.
2009 BURUNDI and TOGO abolished the death penalty for all crimes.
2010 GABON removed the death penalty from its legislation.
2012 LATVIA abolished the death penalty for all crimes.

Notes:
1. In 1990 the German Democratic Republic became unified with the Federal Republic of Germany, where the death penalty had been abolished in 1949.
2. Slovenia and Croatia abolished the death penalty while they were still republics of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. The two republics became independent in 1991.
3. In 1993 the Czech and Slovak Federal Republic divided into two states, the Czech Republic and Slovakia.
4. In 1997 Hong Kong was returned to Chinese rule as a special administrative region of China. Amnesty International understands that Hong Kong will remain abolitionist.
5. In 1999 the Latvian parliament voted to ratify Protocol No. 6 to the European Convention on Human Rights, abolishing the death penalty for peacetime offenses.
6. In 2007 Albania ratified Protocol No. 13 to the European Convention on Human Rights, abolishing the death penalty in all circumstances. In 2000 it had ratified Protocol No. 6 to the European Convention on Human Rights, abolishing the death penalty for peacetime offences.
7. In 2001 Bosnia-Herzegovina ratified the Second Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, abolishing the death penalty for all crimes.
8. In 2005 Liberia ratified the Second Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, abolishing the death penalty for all crimes.
9. Montenegro had already abolished the death penalty in 2002 when it was part of a state union with Serbia. It became an independent member state of the United Nations on 28 June 2006. Its ratification of Protocol No. 13 to the European Convention on Human Rights, abolishing the death penalty in all circumstances, came into effect on 6 June 2006.

http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/abolitionist-and-retentionist-countries

 


Child in Action,speaking to soldiers.

 

From Faktensucher

 


H3N3 and Glaxo

 

Transalated from the Greek BlogSpot Translation may not be correct.Sorry

I intended not to deal with another vaccine and in particular the widespread misinformation that comes from journalists who believe that the writings are similar to something like the infallibility of the Pope.
I say this because I sent e-mail to the journalist who had published the text that I wrote the post-ELEFTHEROTYPIA a controversial INFORMATION FOR THE VACCINE and in which I wrote:
that the newspaper should be made to repudiate the misstatements published, I believe in good faith.
He replied:
what I did was to present another view. What circulates on the Web, it circulates in the mail, all gathered on the occasion of the panic of the flu.
Nowhere do I write that their views are valid. Nowhere do not accept any of these additional opinions and write clearly “your comments”.
And the rejoinder that:
in the text are not just opinions but false news like eg:
1-Obama’s daughters will be vaccinated if not already vaccinated.
2-5 women, all nurses and therefore a high risk group who had been vaccinated, died when they died none.
Already 3-Poland and the Czech Republic forbade vaccination in countries where no such ban in the Czech Republic starting this week
4-Complaints to say that the vast majority of deaths from the “pandemic” flu occurred in Mexico, where they had become free vaccination to residents when seeking now to get the vaccines.
5-a former health minister of Finland, just as He alone himself!
All of these are not opinions but false news that people who read a serious newspaper (well after it is serious read from her first sex!) Considers them as given.
I would have never objected to display different views but with the difference that should be emphasized and what is and how serious is he who says it.
Write what the Jane Burgermeister write but he believes there is an international conspiracy by the Illuminati!
Write what the Rauni-Leena Luukanen-Kilde, the self-styled minister of Finland, but write it he also said he saved the lives of 3 times the aliens!
Thus the reader learns and what is said by various and how serious are those who say it.
I hope that in your next text will clarify that many of these scenarios are not related to the fact that publishing these to restore.
As you can see there was not no good answer for this and simply put in words eg Gougli Filandias Minister asking to bring you only the site from Greece to see the play as a serious news of her, and respectively for Obama’s daughters etc.
As I said at the beginning I would have xanascholithei the question whether the same paper of 28.11.09 there appeared an article entitled:
Economic games with vaccine … behind our backs it with an emphasis on academics, Professor of Biochemistry Department of Biology, University of Patras, Christos Georgiou.
Of course the article not only discussed our finances are games that are behind our backs!.
The article begins with the alarmism of the vaccine due to the withdrawal of a batch of vaccine in Canada because it occurred in some anaphylactic reactions at 500% more than expected!
So read the link that refers us: This is five times the expected number. None of the patients reportedly suffered long-term ill-effects. (1)
(The numbers in parentheses are the numbers from the same references in the article).
According to recent data (25/11/09) Canada 7,500,000 vaccines have been sent and the rate of side effects have been observed in all batches of the vaccine is 0.32 per 100,000 people.
From the batch of 172,000 vaccines observed in cases of anaphylaxis, this percentage was 4/100.0000, returned to control 15,000 who did not have time to use, control continues, but have not yet seen any obvious problem in the production and so and speculated statistical anomaly.
The WHO announced that they have been vaccinated in the world 65,000,000 people, until last week, and found that the pandemic vaccine is as safe as seasonal.
He then writes about 3 deaths: made within one week of receiving the vaccine, and we refer to an article from a site in the vaccination has the key title. Canada: The Killer H1N1 Vaccine. Manitoba and Quebec: Three deaths resulting from the H1N1 Vaccine. (2)
Of course the same article we read that: The news reports have highlighted deaths resulting from the H1N1 flu (often unconfirmed) ….
The 2 mentioned on the news were a diabetic woman and another 80 years.
Then under the scaremongering informs us that the government and our media have concealed that the vaccine is made in Canada is the same as what happens in our country which the ingenious investigator discovered just reading the published and accessible on the Internet patent to everyone!
This text could be missing and intimidation of the classical world: the dangerous components of the vaccine (the Pandemrix), such as squalene adjuvant (page 44) and the toxic mercuric thiomersal (page 12) [6].
So Squalene is an unsaturated oil involved in the biosynthesis of cholesterol in our body. (Page 13 of reference 6)
That is to sit in your blood vessels from cholesterol that devour hamburgers has been involved in the synthesis of squalene, which incidentally has speculated that antikarkinogono action.
Let us now look at another dangerous ingredient thimerosal for which I have already written that the WHO considers the use of safe vaccines.
In Pandemrix of GSK, a dose of 0,5 mL contains 2.5 mg of mercury and mercury is 50% of the mass of thiomersal and the mass of a dose is 5 micrograms.
One microgram (mg) is one millionth of a gram!
To funny thing is that according to the EFSA (Εuropean Food Safety Authority, data of 2004) a 80 Kg adult Greeks out a week in 40 – 160 micrograms of mercury, due to consumption of seafood.
And seafood unfortunately do not contain mercury but ethyl methyl mercury, which bioaccumulates and has a half-life (time to reduce the activity in 50% of initial) 1.5 to 2 months. (Data from the blog BioLogos)
But without misinformation and little anti-Americanism is not!
He writes: The same was done and the American company Baxter (much of which holds shares of the notorious former Defence Minister Bush, Donald Rumsfeld)
Diana gets here!
Because only the face of Rumsfeld causes most of us more important than rash that may cause the vaccine!
Only Rumsfeld has no relationship with Baxter, but the company Gilead Sciences Inc. that built the Tamiflu and of which he was president from 1997 until January 2001.
We read also below:
Another important issue raised is whether Glaxo and Baxter (which makes the American Celvapan vaccine for the H1N1 virus) was prepared years ago for a pandemic of swine flu, with all that entails. This is supported by the fact that both companies had submitted patents for such vaccines long before he found the virus in humans for the first time in March-April 2009 in Mexico. So …. when you broke the swine flu in 2009, both companies were ready by 2006.
We do not refer to the relevant link on the so-called consolidation.
Let’s look at things in order.
At a meeting of the WHO in Geneva (on 2-3 November 2005) was meeting to “review and develop pandemic influenza vaccines” [10]
In this he had invited the co-inventor of the vaccine Baxter, Dr. Kistner Otfried along with other representatives from the research laboratories of pharmaceutical companies, including Dr. Norbet Hehme of Glaxo.
This fact is, the columnist, indicative of how the WHO and the pharmaceutical companies function as communicating vessels!
In fact since it would be talking about vaccines for a possible pandemic should have cried some astrologers as qualified or even the need arthrografounta the teacher or at least me!
Course to better understand the function as communicating vessels of WHO and the pharmaceutical industry, omitted to say that in a meeting attended by 29 experts from various countries of the world, 17 scientists and industry representatives 16 of the WHO Secretariat.
Of course, if the WHO had not dealt with the flu vaccine, the same people who now believe that 62 people from all parts of the world conspired to sell us vaccines, prosecutors were labrys WHO showing indifference towards health of the people!
In 2005 was known, the fear of a pandemic mutation strain of H5N1 avian influenza, the mortality from this time reached 60% of patients.
So the vaccines that were to be built were the strains recommended by WHO and are they potentially could cause an epidemic.
A preferred composition contains three inactivated split virion antigens from the WHO recommended strains of the appropriate influenza season. (Sel12 of 6)
In what we were ready companies listed on the page exactly 23 (6) of the patent Pandemrix.
In a preferred embodiment, the influenza strain may be associated with a pandemic outbreak or have the potential to be associated with a pandemic outbreak. In particular, when the vaccine is a multivalent vaccine such as a bivalent or a trivalent vaccine, at least one strain is associated with a pandemic outbreak or has the potential to be associated with a pandemic outbreak. Suitable strains are, but not limited to: H5N1, H9N2, H7N7, H2N2, H1N1.
The fear then it was an epidemic of the H5N1 and therefore the vaccines were originally directed to him, and of course, H1N1 has been known since 1918 that may cause a pandemic! (P. 26 of 6)
If such viruses have the potential to spread from person to person, they may spread worldwide within a few months to a year, resulting in a pandemic. For example, in 1957 (Asian Flu pandemic), viruses of the H2N2 subtype replaced H1N1 viruses that had been circulating in the human population since at least 1918 when the virus was first isolated.
The Baxter and the application for patent in production of viral vaccines (9)
writes: In particular preferred embodiments the composition or comprises more than one antigen, eg 2,3,4,5,6,7, or 8, in particular of different virus strains, subtypes or types such as influenza A and influenza B, in particular selected from one or more of human H1N1, H2N2, H3N3, H5N2, H5N1, H7N7, H1N2, H9N2, H7N2, H7N3, H10N7 subtypes, of the pig flu H1N1, H2N2, H3N1 and H3N2 subtypes, of the dog or horse flu H7N7, H3N8 subtypes or of the avian H5N1, H7N2, H1N7, H7N3, H13N6, H5N9, H11N6, H3N8, H9N2, H5N2, H4N8, H10N7, H2N2, H8N4, H14N5, H6N5, H12N5 sybtypes.
Nevertheless what we read?
So when you broke the swine flu in 2009, both companies were ready by 2006. Just changed the mold with vaccine-H1N1 vaccine preparation and the WHO-approved in record time! It is indeed surprising how the timing of these companies with the advent of swine flu was so … Perfect!
That followed the classical procedure done every year with the seasonal vaccine and of course because you can not predict what strain will cause a pandemic did not have time to incorporate the seasonal epidemic strain in the vaccine!
So the marketing authorization for the H1N1 vaccine was finally on September 29, 2009.
Why did you read it here *.
Derived from the office of the Public Health Agency of Canada also gives all the possible answers to questions concerning the H1N1 virus.
Finally, at the Stockholm Conference in 2007 organized by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control dealt with the issue of a technical report of the special groups in vaccines for humans with the H5N1 9 scientists in research related to vaccines and pharmaceutical companies 13 independent from various European countries. (11)
Under all that we discussed above article ends with the erudite conclusion:
And our public health services continue to reassure us, without … “Sweat the ear” about the interrelated economic-political interests!
The conclusions and comments are yours!

 


The Echelon USA Surveillance Programme: the documentation

 

In the greatest surveillance effort ever established, the US
National Security Agency
(
NSA
) has createda global spy system, codename
ECHELON
, which captures and analyzes virtually every phone call, fax,email and telex message sent anywhere in the world.

ECHELON is controlled by the NSA and is operated in conjunction with the
Government Communications Head Quarters
(
GCHQ
) of England, the
Communications Security Establishment
(
CSE
)of Canada, the
Australian Defense Security Directorate
(
DSD
), and the
General CommunicationsSecurity Bureau
(
GCSB
) of New Zealand.

These organizations are bound together under a secret 1948 agreement,
UKUSA
, whose terms and textremain under wraps even today.The
ECHELON system
is fairly simple in design: position intercept stations all over the world to captureall satellite, microwave, cellular and fiber-optic communications traffic, and then process this informationthrough the massive computer capabilities of the
NSA
, including advanced voice recognition and
optical character recognition
(
OCR
) programs, and look for code words or phrases (known as the
ECHELON

Dictionary
”) that will prompt the computers to flag the message for recording and transcribing for futureanalysis.

Intelligence analysts at each of the respective “listening stations” maintain separate keyword lists for them to analyze any conversation or document flagged by the system, which is then forwarded to therespective intelligence agency headquarters that requested the intercept.But apart from directing their ears towards terrorists and rogue states,
ECHELON
is also being used for purposes well outside its original mission. The regular discovery of domestic surveillance targeted atAmerican civilians for reasons of “unpopular” political affiliation or for no probable cause at all in violationof the First, Fourth and Fifth Amendments of the
Constitution
– are consistently impeded by veryelaborate and complex legal arguments and privilege claims by the intelligence agencies and the USgovernment.

The guardians and caretakers of our liberties, our duly elected political representatives, give scarceattention to these activities, let alone the abuses that occur under their watch.

Among the activities that the
ECHELON
targets are:
Political spying:
Since the close of World War II, the US intelligence agencies have developed aconsistent record of trampling the rights and liberties of the American people.

Even after the investigations into the domestic and political surveillance activities of theagencies that followed in the wake of the
Watergate fiasco
, the
NSA
continues to target

 


Well Balanced Blog

Take Control of Your Own Health!

Έγκλημα και Τιμωρία/Crime and Punishment/Crime et Châtiment/Delitto e castigo/Преступление и наказание

CRIME DOES NOT PAY... PLUS, THE BUTLER DID IT! AND REMEMBER: WHAT DOESN'T KILL YOU, WILL -MOST LIKELY- TRY AGAIN... AND DON'T FORGET: TODAY IS A GOOD DAY FOR SOMEONE ELSE TO DIE.

BanTheBBC Blog

A constant reminder that life would be so much better without the BBC's TV Licence Gestapo

Healthy At Any Age

Welcome to June Rousso's Blog !

iGlinavos

Thoughts of a recovering leftist

Scottish Gaelic

Word a Day

NEO INKA - ΣΕ ΠΡΟΣΤΑΤΕΥΕΙ, ΔΥΝΑΜΩΣΕ ΤΟ!!!

ΓΙΝΕ Ο ΕΠΟΜΕΝΟΣ ΚΡΙΚΟΣ ΣΤΟ ΔΙΚΤΥΟ.

Talk of the Tail

"Tails" from pets searching for their forever home.

ultimatemindsettoday

A great WordPress.com site

Are You Finished Yet?

Alea Jacta Est

Watts Up With That?

The world's most viewed site on global warming and climate change

Levi Quackenboss

Putting the boss in quack.

KXAN.com

Austin News & Weather - Austin Texas, Round Rock, TX

Unstrange Mind

Remapping My World

psychinfo.gr

ΛΙΝΑ ΨΟΥΝΗ • psouni@gmail.com • www.psychinfo.gr

Wee Ginger Dug

Biting the hand of Project Fear

QuitTrain®

Quit Smoking & Take Your Freedom Back!

%d bloggers like this: